On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:59:39PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> No, you have it backward.
> It is valid to pass void* to a const void* function.
> It is *not* valid to pass const void* to a void* function.
>
> Right now __chk_user_ptr is a void* function, meaning
> that all the places where it gets
On 3/26/07, Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:23:56AM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> Change prototypes for __chk_user_ptr and __chk_io_ptr
> to take const void* instead of void*, so that code can pass
> const void* to them. (Right now sparse does not warn
> about
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:23:56AM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
> Change prototypes for __chk_user_ptr and __chk_io_ptr
> to take const void* instead of void*, so that code can pass
> const void* to them. (Right now sparse does not warn
> about passing const void* to void* functions, but that
> is a
Change prototypes for __chk_user_ptr and __chk_io_ptr
to take const void* instead of void*, so that code can pass
const void* to them. (Right now sparse does not warn
about passing const void* to void* functions, but that
is a separate bug that I believe Josh is working on,
and once sparse does
Change prototypes for __chk_user_ptr and __chk_io_ptr
to take const void* instead of void*, so that code can pass
const void* to them. (Right now sparse does not warn
about passing const void* to void* functions, but that
is a separate bug that I believe Josh is working on,
and once sparse does
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:23:56AM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
Change prototypes for __chk_user_ptr and __chk_io_ptr
to take const void* instead of void*, so that code can pass
const void* to them. (Right now sparse does not warn
about passing const void* to void* functions, but that
is a
On 3/26/07, Christopher Li [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 11:23:56AM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
Change prototypes for __chk_user_ptr and __chk_io_ptr
to take const void* instead of void*, so that code can pass
const void* to them. (Right now sparse does not warn
about passing
On Mon, Mar 26, 2007 at 02:59:39PM -0400, Russ Cox wrote:
No, you have it backward.
It is valid to pass void* to a const void* function.
It is *not* valid to pass const void* to a void* function.
Right now __chk_user_ptr is a void* function, meaning
that all the places where it gets passed
8 matches
Mail list logo
