Re: [PATCH] Be explicit about what the x86 0x020c boot parameter version requires.

2013-03-07 Thread Matt Fleming
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 20:31 -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 03/06/2013 10:00 AM, Peter Jones wrote: > > This should help avoid making the incorrect change in non-compliant > > bootloaders. > > > > Signed-off-by: Peter Jones > > --- > > Documentation/x86/boot.txt | 5 +++-- > > arch

Re: [PATCH] Be explicit about what the x86 0x020c boot parameter version requires.

2013-03-06 Thread H. Peter Anvin
On 03/06/2013 10:00 AM, Peter Jones wrote: > This should help avoid making the incorrect change in non-compliant > bootloaders. > > Signed-off-by: Peter Jones > --- > Documentation/x86/boot.txt | 5 +++-- > arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam_utils.h | 7 +++ > 2 files changed, 10 ins

[PATCH] Be explicit about what the x86 0x020c boot parameter version requires.

2013-03-06 Thread Peter Jones
This should help avoid making the incorrect change in non-compliant bootloaders. Signed-off-by: Peter Jones --- Documentation/x86/boot.txt | 5 +++-- arch/x86/include/asm/bootparam_utils.h | 7 +++ 2 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/x86/