Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls

On Mon, 2007-04-02 at 16:23 +0200, Jens Axboe wrote: > FWIW, it had my ack, I think we were just waiting for Doug to ack the sg > bits. And there's really nothing I can do (well, except write the thing) since the changes are not in any SCSI pieces I maintain directly ... they're block and sg. Jam

Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls

On Mon, Apr 02 2007, Alan Stern wrote: > On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > this is a repost as I like to know the current state of the problem... > > > > The USB DMA size problem is known to exist on Linux since February 2004. > > I am still in hope that there will be

Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls

On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Hi, > > this is a repost as I like to know the current state of the problem... > > The USB DMA size problem is known to exist on Linux since February 2004. > I am still in hope that there will be a fix soon. Me too. I submitted the most recent versi

Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls Re: [PATCH] Block layer: separate out queue-oriented ioctls

Hi, this is a repost as I like to know the current state of the problem... The USB DMA size problem is known to exist on Linux since February 2004. I am still in hope that there will be a fix soon. /*--*/ Alan Stern <[EMAIL