On Wed, 23 Jul 2014, Eric Paris wrote:
> This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
> plus fixing it a different way...
Applied to
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jmorris/linux-security.git next
--
James Morris
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Quoting Kees Cook (keesc...@chromium.org):
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> > On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 13:46 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> >> On 07/23/2014 12:36 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> >> > This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
> >> > plus f
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 1:49 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 13:46 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> On 07/23/2014 12:36 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
>> > This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
>> > plus fixing it a different way...
>>
>> You sent something
On Wed, 2014-07-23 at 13:46 -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On 07/23/2014 12:36 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> > This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
> > plus fixing it a different way...
>
> You sent something like this a couple days ago. What changed?
right when I
On 07/23/2014 12:36 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
> plus fixing it a different way...
You sent something like this a couple days ago. What changed?
--Andy
>
> We found, when trying to run an application from an application whic
This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
plus fixing it a different way...
We found, when trying to run an application from an application which
had dropped privs that the kernel does security checks on undefined
capability bits. This was ESPECIALLY difficult to de
Quoting Andrew Vagin (ava...@parallels.com):
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 04:59:01PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> > This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
> > plus fixing it a different way...
> >
> > We found, when trying to run an application from an application whic
On Mon, Jul 21, 2014 at 04:59:01PM -0400, Eric Paris wrote:
> This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
> plus fixing it a different way...
>
> We found, when trying to run an application from an application which
> had dropped privs that the kernel does security che
Quoting Eric Paris (epa...@redhat.com):
> This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
> plus fixing it a different way...
>
> We found, when trying to run an application from an application which
> had dropped privs that the kernel does security checks on undefined
> c
On 07/21/2014 01:59 PM, Eric Paris wrote:
> This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
> plus fixing it a different way...
>
> We found, when trying to run an application from an application which
> had dropped privs that the kernel does security checks on undefined
>
This is effectively a revert of 7b9a7ec565505699f503b4fcf61500dceb36e744
plus fixing it a different way...
We found, when trying to run an application from an application which
had dropped privs that the kernel does security checks on undefined
capability bits. This was ESPECIALLY difficult to de
11 matches
Mail list logo