Hello,
On 2014-05-29 16:56, Laura Abbott wrote:
On 5/29/2014 12:34 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-05-29 08:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> 'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
>> for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
On Thu, May 29 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
> for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
> can't find appropriate area in bitmap, we release cma_mutex global lock
> rather than cma->lock and this is a
On Thu, 29 May 2014, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> 'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
> for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
> can't find appropriate area in bitmap, we release cma_mutex global lock
> rather than cma->lock and this is a
On 5/29/2014 12:34 AM, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On 2014-05-29 08:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
>> 'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
>> for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
>> can't find appropriate area in bitmap, we relea
Hello,
On 2014-05-29 08:29, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
can't find appropriate area in bitmap, we release cma_mutex global lock
rather than cma->lock and this is a
'cma: Remove potential deadlock situation' introduces per cma area mutex
for bitmap management. It is good, but there is one mistake. When we
can't find appropriate area in bitmap, we release cma_mutex global lock
rather than cma->lock and this is a bug. So fix it.
Signed-off-by: Joonsoo Kim
dif
6 matches
Mail list logo
