Re: [PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-11-19 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:42:41 +0800 Chao Fan wrote: > >Sorry for the delay on this. Life has been...challenging... > > > >> Signed-off-by: Cao Jin > >> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan > > > >What does this signoff chain

Re: [PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-11-19 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Mon, 14 Nov 2016 11:42:41 +0800 Chao Fan wrote: > >Sorry for the delay on this. Life has been...challenging... > > > >> Signed-off-by: Cao Jin > >> Signed-off-by: Chao Fan > > > >What does this signoff chain mean? > > Hi jon, > > I made this patch. He is my colleague who helped

Re: [PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-11-13 Thread Chao Fan
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 08:47:55AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:41:28 +0800 >Chao Fan wrote: > >> The iowait is not reliable by reading from /proc/stat, so this >> method to get iowait is not suggested. And we mark it in the >> document. > >Sorry

Re: [PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-11-13 Thread Chao Fan
On Sun, Nov 13, 2016 at 08:47:55AM -0700, Jonathan Corbet wrote: >On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:41:28 +0800 >Chao Fan wrote: > >> The iowait is not reliable by reading from /proc/stat, so this >> method to get iowait is not suggested. And we mark it in the >> document. > >Sorry for the delay on this.

Re: [PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-11-13 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:41:28 +0800 Chao Fan wrote: > The iowait is not reliable by reading from /proc/stat, so this > method to get iowait is not suggested. And we mark it in the > document. Sorry for the delay on this. Life has been...challenging... > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-11-13 Thread Jonathan Corbet
On Wed, 26 Oct 2016 10:41:28 +0800 Chao Fan wrote: > The iowait is not reliable by reading from /proc/stat, so this > method to get iowait is not suggested. And we mark it in the > document. Sorry for the delay on this. Life has been...challenging... > Signed-off-by: Cao Jin > Signed-off-by:

Re: [PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-11-08 Thread Chao Fan
ping Thanks, Chao Fan On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:41:28AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote: >The iowait is not reliable by reading from /proc/stat, so this >method to get iowait is not suggested. And we mark it in the >document. > >Signed-off-by: Cao Jin >Signed-off-by: Chao Fan

Re: [PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-11-08 Thread Chao Fan
ping Thanks, Chao Fan On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 10:41:28AM +0800, Chao Fan wrote: >The iowait is not reliable by reading from /proc/stat, so this >method to get iowait is not suggested. And we mark it in the >document. > >Signed-off-by: Cao Jin >Signed-off-by: Chao Fan >--- >

[PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-10-25 Thread Chao Fan
The iowait is not reliable by reading from /proc/stat, so this method to get iowait is not suggested. And we mark it in the document. Signed-off-by: Cao Jin Signed-off-by: Chao Fan --- Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 11 ++- 1

[PATCH] Change the document about iowait

2016-10-25 Thread Chao Fan
The iowait is not reliable by reading from /proc/stat, so this method to get iowait is not suggested. And we mark it in the document. Signed-off-by: Cao Jin Signed-off-by: Chao Fan --- Documentation/filesystems/proc.txt | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff