[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:17:45AM -0500
Remove an (incorrect) assertion that NOHIGHMEM is right for more
users, since most systems are coming with at least 1G of memory these
days, and even some laptops have up 4G of memory.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:17:45AM -0500
Remove an (incorrect) assertion that NOHIGHMEM is right for more
users, since most systems are coming with at least 1G of memory these
days, and even some laptops have up 4G of memory.
On Thursday 14 December 2006 15:37, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > + 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer "off" here.
>
> I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
> than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
It does, because if you have exactly 1G
Theodore Tso wrote:
+ 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer "off" here.
I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
If we want to be even more explicit about this, then if the CPU level
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:37 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > + 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer "off" here.
> >
>
> I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
> than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
>
> If we want to be even more
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:17 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > > I'd be happy to know how to enable it.
> >
> > CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y
>
> This is not at all obvious from arch/i386/Kconfig. Maybe we should
> fix this?
looks better; maybe add how to look for "pae" and "nx" in
the /proc/cpuinfo flags
From: Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:17:45AM -0500
>
> Remove an (incorrect) assertion that NOHIGHMEM is right for more
> users, since most systems are coming with at least 1G of memory these
> days, and even some laptops have up 4G of memory.
Given this (on a
> + 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer "off" here.
>
I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
If we want to be even more explicit about this, then if the CPU level
selected by the user is
> > I'd be happy to know how to enable it.
>
> CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y
This is not at all obvious from arch/i386/Kconfig. Maybe we should
fix this?
- Ted
Add an explanation that HIGHMEM64G is needed in order to get support
for the NX feature.
Remove an
I'd be happy to know how to enable it.
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y
This is not at all obvious from arch/i386/Kconfig. Maybe we should
fix this?
- Ted
Add an explanation that HIGHMEM64G is needed in order to get support
for the NX feature.
Remove an
+ 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer off here.
I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
If we want to be even more explicit about this, then if the CPU level
selected by the user is greater
From: Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, Dec 14, 2006 at 10:17:45AM -0500
Remove an (incorrect) assertion that NOHIGHMEM is right for more
users, since most systems are coming with at least 1G of memory these
days, and even some laptops have up 4G of memory.
Given this (on a system
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:17 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
I'd be happy to know how to enable it.
CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G=y
This is not at all obvious from arch/i386/Kconfig. Maybe we should
fix this?
looks better; maybe add how to look for pae and nx in
the /proc/cpuinfo flags line ?
--
if
On Thu, 2006-12-14 at 10:37 -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
+ 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer off here.
I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
If we want to be even more explicit about
Theodore Tso wrote:
+ 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer off here.
I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
If we want to be even more explicit about this, then if the CPU level
On Thursday 14 December 2006 15:37, Theodore Tso wrote:
+ 1 Gigabyte or more total physical RAM, answer off here.
I don't think your proposed wording (1 gigabyte or more) versus (more
than 1 gigabyte) doesn't really change the sense of this.
It does, because if you have exactly 1G of
16 matches
Mail list logo
