Re: [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code v2 (Linux Tiny)

2008-02-17 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:56:45 -0600 > Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > > > Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in > > > order to be able to

Re: [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code v2 (Linux Tiny)

2008-02-12 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:56:45 -0600 Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > > > Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in > > order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not > > needed, a

Re: [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code v2 (Linux Tiny)

2008-02-12 Thread Matt Mackall
On Tue, 2008-02-12 at 10:04 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in > order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not > needed, and then reduce the kernel code size. > > With CONFIG_DMI (i.e before) : > >text

[PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code v2 (Linux Tiny)

2008-02-12 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hi, Enclosed patch is an updated version, with proper credits to Matt Mackall and the Linux Tiny project. Sincerly, Thomas --- Turn CONFIG_DMI into a selectable option if EMBEDDED is defined, in order to be able to remove the DMI table scanning code if it's not needed, and then reduce the kern

Re: [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code

2008-02-11 Thread Andrew Morton
On Tue, 12 Feb 2008 08:33:23 +0100 Thomas Petazzoni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If I resend a new one with proper credits, will Andrew pick it up and > replace the old version by the new version ? yup. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a me

Re: [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code

2008-02-11 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hi Matt, Thanks for your review. Le Mon, 11 Feb 2008 13:01:18 -0600, Matt Mackall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit : > Looks ok. Please preserve original authorship (ie me) in some fashion > in your description. Andrew seems to already have picked up the patch in -mm (I received an e-mail + x86-conf

Re: [PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code

2008-02-11 Thread Matt Mackall
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 17:58 +0100, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Hi, > > The enclosed patch allows to remove the DMI scanning code when > CONFIG_EMBEDDED is defined. It's basically the dma_blacklist patch of > Linux-Tiny ported to 2.6.25-rc1, with the required modifications. It > allows to remove ~10

[PATCH] Configure out DMI scanning code

2008-02-11 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Hi, The enclosed patch allows to remove the DMI scanning code when CONFIG_EMBEDDED is defined. It's basically the dma_blacklist patch of Linux-Tiny ported to 2.6.25-rc1, with the required modifications. It allows to remove ~10k from the kernel code/data size. On top of this patch, I've tested if