Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > b) add the patch (in -mm or early 14 or later), see if any applications > break, but we will finally match the man pages and etc. We'll definitely test the patch. I doubt it breaks anything, and it's the right thing to do, but yes, we'll try it

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-16 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 14:20 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: > On 8/13/05, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:00:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-16 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sun, 2005-08-14 at 14:20 +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: On 8/13/05, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:00:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte:

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-16 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Tue, 16 Aug 2005, Steven Rostedt wrote: b) add the patch (in -mm or early 14 or later), see if any applications break, but we will finally match the man pages and etc. We'll definitely test the patch. I doubt it breaks anything, and it's the right thing to do, but yes, we'll try it out

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-14 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 8/13/05, Andi Kleen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:00:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte: > > > > Here's a patch that converts all architectures

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-14 Thread Jesper Juhl
On 8/13/05, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:00:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte: Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:00:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte: > > > Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave like other unix > > > boxes signal handling.

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > Also, what you snipped was another issue, not addressed by the patch. Some architectures test if the setting up of the signal handler stack frame succeeded, and others don't. I believe that this may be a problem, since it was recently

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: > On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte: > > Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave like other unix > > boxes signal handling. It's funny that I didn't need to change the m68k > > architecture, since

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte: > Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave like other unix > boxes signal handling. It's funny that I didn't need to change the m68k > architecture, since it was the only one that already behaves this way! > (the

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte: Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave like other unix boxes signal handling. It's funny that I didn't need to change the m68k architecture, since it was the only one that already behaves this way! (the

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte: Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave like other unix boxes signal handling. It's funny that I didn't need to change the m68k architecture, since it was

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-13 Thread Steven Rostedt
On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: rest snipped which also wasn't better Also, what you snipped was another issue, not addressed by the patch. Some architectures test if the setting up of the signal handler stack frame succeeded, and others don't. I believe that this may be a

Re: [PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-13 Thread Andi Kleen
On Sat, Aug 13, 2005 at 10:00:14AM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: On Sat, 2005-08-13 at 14:39 +0200, Andi Kleen wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 10:40:02PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wroqte: Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave like other unix boxes signal handling. It's funny

[PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave like other unix boxes signal handling. It's funny that I didn't need to change the m68k architecture, since it was the only one that already behaves this way! (the m68knommu does not!) Also, I noticed that not all check the return value of

[PATCH] Convert sigaction to act like other unices

2005-08-12 Thread Steven Rostedt
Here's a patch that converts all architectures to behave like other unix boxes signal handling. It's funny that I didn't need to change the m68k architecture, since it was the only one that already behaves this way! (the m68knommu does not!) Also, I noticed that not all check the return value of