On 10/04/2007 05:01 AM, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Well the x86-64 option was there first; you have to ask whoever
> added the i386 option why they used a different name
>
> But I normally added aliases as people reported them. Nobody did in
> this case.
>
> One reason is probably that noapictimer i
On Wednesday 03 October 2007 18:58, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
> On 10/03/2007 12:10 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > Randy Dunlap wrote:
> >> Maybe we can/should merge the doc files along with the x86 arch merge.
> >
> > Well, the x86 merge is pretty much mechanical. It should be followed up
> > with a lot
On 10/03/2007 12:10 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
>>
>> Maybe we can/should merge the doc files along with the x86 arch merge.
>>
>
> Well, the x86 merge is pretty much mechanical. It should be followed up
> with a lot of manual merging.
>
It would be really nice if identical
Jeff Garzik wrote:
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:34:13 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
After having to go figure out what some of these means, I figured I
would save others the trouble.
Some of these are "best guess" based on a quick sca
Randy Dunlap wrote:
Maybe we can/should merge the doc files along with the x86 arch merge.
Well, the x86 merge is pretty much mechanical. It should be followed up
with a lot of manual merging.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the bo
On Tue, 02 Oct 2007 22:30:31 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:34:13 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
> >
> >> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> ---
> >> After having to go figure out what some of these means, I figured I
> >> would save others the
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:34:13 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
After having to go figure out what some of these means, I figured I
would save others the trouble.
Some of these are "best guess" based on a quick scan of the code, so it
On Tue, 2 Oct 2007 21:34:13 -0400 Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> ---
> After having to go figure out what some of these means, I figured I
> would save others the trouble.
>
> Some of these are "best guess" based on a quick scan of the code, so it
> certa
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
After having to go figure out what some of these means, I figured I
would save others the trouble.
Some of these are "best guess" based on a quick scan of the code, so it
certainly needs a sanity review before going upstream.
diff --git a/Docume
9 matches
Mail list logo