On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 8:53 AM Sedat Dilek wrote:
>
> Thanks for the text - a first good step.
>
> Do you plan checks in the source-code - in the future (see [1] where I
> played a bit)?
Oh, I forgot! Good idea, will add a check to compiler-clang.h.
> Arch-specific supported LLVM toolchain vers
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 12:26 AM 'Nick Desaulniers' via Clang Built
Linux wrote:
>
> Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start
> small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now.
>
> We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over
>
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start
> small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now.
>
> We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over
> time. Also, not
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start
> small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now.
>
> We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over
> time. Also, not
On 8/25/20 17:51, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
>> Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start
>> small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now.
>>
>> We can probably widen the support w
On Tue, 25 Aug 2020 15:51:31 -0700
Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> > +Clang/LLVM (optional) 10.0.1 clang --version
>
> Maybe it is worth making the "(optional)" a footnote like Sphinx? Seems
> to just kind of stick out to me but I do not have a strong opinion
> unless others do.
Let's n
On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 03:25:51PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start
> small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now.
>
> We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over
> time. Also, not
Based on a vote at the LLVM BoF at Plumbers 2020, we decided to start
small, supporting just one formal upstream release of LLVM for now.
We can probably widen the support window of supported versions over
time. Also, note that LLVM's release process is different than GCC's.
GCC tends to have 1 m
8 matches
Mail list logo