Hi David,
On 02/29/2016 10:22 PM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Feb 2016, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
>
>> Linux also updates sempid for SETVAL operations and semaphore
>> adjustments. However, somewhat inconsistently, it does not
>> update sempid for SETALL operations.
On Sun, 28 Feb 2016, Michael Kerrisk wrote:
Linux also updates sempid for SETVAL operations and semaphore
adjustments. However, somewhat inconsistently, it does not
update sempid for SETALL operations. While the SETALL behavior
might be viewed as a bug, the behavi
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:42 AM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
wrote:
> Agreed. Is it better to change the man page and document the behaviour?
Requoting text I just added to the Bugzilla report to explain why the
right approach seems to be to document, rather than change this
behavior:
So, given t
Agreed. Is it better to change the man page and document the behaviour?
Regards,
PrasannaKumar
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
Furthermore, semop.2 is very explicit about sempid. That said, I am also weary
of this
change because we've been setting semval for semctl for so long.
s/semval/sempid :)
On Fri, 26 Feb 2016, Manfred Spraul wrote:
This is a user-visible change, adding mtk.
Hi,
On 02/26/2016 01:21 PM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
From: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
As described in bug #112271 (bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271)
don't set sempid in semctl syscall. S
Hi,
On 02/26/2016 01:21 PM, PrasannaKumar Muralidharan wrote:
From: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
As described in bug #112271 (bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271)
don't set sempid in semctl syscall. Set sempid only when semop is called.
I disagree with the bug report:
sempid is (and alw
From: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
As described in bug #112271 (bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112271)
don't set sempid in semctl syscall. Set sempid only when semop is called.
Signed-off-by: PrasannaKumar Muralidharan
---
ipc/sem.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/ipc/sem
8 matches
Mail list logo