Re: [PATCH] Dynamic Tick version 050406-1

* Frank Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050407 15:21]: > Frank Sorenson wrote: > > Tony Lindgren wrote: > > > >>Thanks for trying it out. What kind of hardware do you have? Does it > >>have HPET? It looks like no suitable timer for dyn-tick is found... > >>Maybe the following patch helps? > >> > >>T

Re: [PATCH] Dynamic Tick version 050406-1

* Alexander Nyberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050407 02:31]: > > > > Here's an updated dyn-tick patch. Some minor fixes: > > > > > > Doesn't look so good here. I get this with 2.6.12-rc2 (plus a few other > > > patches). > > > Disabling Dynamic Tick makes everything happy again (it boots). > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] Dynamic Tick version 050406-1

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Frank Sorenson wrote: > Tony Lindgren wrote: > >>Thanks for trying it out. What kind of hardware do you have? Does it >>have HPET? It looks like no suitable timer for dyn-tick is found... >>Maybe the following patch helps? >> >>Tony > > > Does 'diff

Re: [PATCH] Dynamic Tick version 050406-1

Tony Lindgren wrote: > Thanks for trying it out. What kind of hardware do you have? Does it > have HPET? It looks like no suitable timer for dyn-tick is found... > Maybe the following patch helps? > > Tony Does 'different crash' qualify as "helping"? :) With this additional patch, I get this li

Re: [PATCH] Dynamic Tick version 050406-1

> > > Here's an updated dyn-tick patch. Some minor fixes: > > > > Doesn't look so good here. I get this with 2.6.12-rc2 (plus a few other > > patches). > > Disabling Dynamic Tick makes everything happy again (it boots). > > > > [4294688.655000] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference a

Re: [PATCH] Dynamic Tick version 050406-1

* Frank Sorenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [050406 14:16]: > Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Here's an updated dyn-tick patch. Some minor fixes: > > Doesn't look so good here. I get this with 2.6.12-rc2 (plus a few other > patches). > Disabling Dynamic Tick makes everything happy again (it b

Re: [PATCH] Dynamic Tick version 050406-1

Tony Lindgren wrote: > Hi all, > > Here's an updated dyn-tick patch. Some minor fixes: Doesn't look so good here. I get this with 2.6.12-rc2 (plus a few other patches). Disabling Dynamic Tick makes everything happy again (it boots). [4294688.655000] Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer derefer

[PATCH] Dynamic Tick version 050406-1

Hi all, Here's an updated dyn-tick patch. Some minor fixes: - Moved updating of time happen before other interrupts are called as noted by Russell King. - Moved call to next_timer_interrupt to generic code from a custom idle module to allow using other idle modules, such as amd76x_pm. - A