On Sat, 2005-07-09 at 18:06 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> > I think that is a really really bad idea. slab is already complex enough
> > and adding scary hacks like this will probably make it collapse
> > under its own weight at some point.
>
> Seco
On Fri, 9 Jul 2005, Andi Kleen wrote:
> I think that is a really really bad idea. slab is already complex enough
> and adding scary hacks like this will probably make it collapse
> under its own weight at some point.
Seconded.
Maybe we can solve this by bringing the system up in a limited
con
Bob Picco <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have a requirement on IA64 to run the ACPI interpreter in the setup_arch
> function before paging_init examines the maximum DMA physical address which
> is limited by the IOMMU. One obstacle is the use of kmalloc/kfree by
> ACPI. Using the bootmem alloc
We have a requirement on IA64 to run the ACPI interpreter in the setup_arch
function before paging_init examines the maximum DMA physical address which
is limited by the IOMMU. One obstacle is the use of kmalloc/kfree by
ACPI. Using the bootmem allocator is unacceptable because > 20Mb of memory
i
4 matches
Mail list logo
