I apologize for sending a separate cover letter for a single patch.
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of
find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like
this:
boolean
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
> The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of
> find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like
> this:
>
>boolean ? __scanbit() : find_first_bit()
Why would you want to write this? What is
The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of
find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like
this:
boolean ? __scanbit() : find_first_bit()
you get an unsigned long result if "boolean" is true, and a signed
long result if "boolean" is false.
In file
The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of
find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like
this:
boolean ? __scanbit() : find_first_bit()
you get an unsigned long result if boolean is true, and a signed
long result if boolean is false.
In file included
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of
find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like
this:
boolean ? __scanbit() : find_first_bit()
Why would you want to write this? What is boolean?
I apologize for sending a separate cover letter for a single patch.
Andi Kleen wrote:
On Wed, Aug 15, 2007 at 05:02:47PM -0400, Chuck Lever wrote:
The return type of __scanbit() doesn't match the return type of
find_{first,next}_bit(). Thus when you construct something like
this:
boolean
6 matches
Mail list logo
