On Sat 10-02-07 23:44:01, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
> [RESEND: forget to add [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> If the DIO write on FAT is expanding the size, it will be fail by -EINVAL,
> because FAT can't handle it now.
>
> This patch fallback it to the normal buffered-write and would return
> success.
>
>
On Sat 10-02-07 23:44:01, OGAWA Hirofumi wrote:
[RESEND: forget to add [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the DIO write on FAT is expanding the size, it will be fail by -EINVAL,
because FAT can't handle it now.
This patch fallback it to the normal buffered-write and would return
success.
[RESEND: forget to add [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the DIO write on FAT is expanding the size, it will be fail by -EINVAL,
because FAT can't handle it now.
This patch fallback it to the normal buffered-write and would return
success.
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
[RESEND: forget to add [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If the DIO write on FAT is expanding the size, it will be fail by -EINVAL,
because FAT can't handle it now.
This patch fallback it to the normal buffered-write and would return
success.
Signed-off-by: OGAWA Hirofumi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/fat/inode.c
4 matches
Mail list logo