On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 2:22 PM, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 08:28:04PM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 16:00:26 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
>> > I'm replying to all your recent patches here as they are fixing things
>> > reported in http://www.viva64.co
On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 08:28:04PM +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 16:00:26 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> > I'm replying to all your recent patches here as they are fixing things
> > reported in http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0299/ . I'ts a good practice to
> > give the credit
On Mon, Jan 05, 2015 at 16:00:26 +0100, David Sterba wrote:
> I'm replying to all your recent patches here as they are fixing things
> reported in http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0299/ . I'ts a good practice to
> give the credit the reporter.
>
> The blogpost also contains analyses of the issues so it
I'm replying to all your recent patches here as they are fixing things
reported in http://www.viva64.com/en/b/0299/ . I'ts a good practice to
give the credit the reporter.
The blogpost also contains analyses of the issues so it could help
reviewing the patches.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: se
On Sun, Jan 04, 2015 at 19:05:22 +0100, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
> In C one can either use '\0' or '\x00' (or '\000') to add a NUL byte to
> a string. '\0x00' isn't part of these and will in fact result in a
> single NUL followed by "x00". This fixes that.
> ---
Forgot to:
Signed-off-by: Giel van
In C one can either use '\0' or '\x00' (or '\000') to add a NUL byte to
a string. '\0x00' isn't part of these and will in fact result in a
single NUL followed by "x00". This fixes that.
---
drivers/isdn/hardware/eicon/message.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/dr
6 matches
Mail list logo
