On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:39:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:24:36AM +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > > > > | fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'ext4_mb_generate_buddy':
> > > > > | fs/ext4/mballoc.c:954: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > > > 'generic_find_next_le_bit'
> > > > >
> > > > > The s390 specific bitops uses pa
> > > > | fs/ext4/mballoc.c: In function 'ext4_mb_generate_buddy':
> > > > | fs/ext4/mballoc.c:954: error: implicit declaration of function
> > > > 'generic_find_next_le_bit'
> > > >
> > > > The s390 specific bitops uses parts of the generic implementation.
> > > > Include the correct header.
> >
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 09:02:40PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Fix ext4 bitops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h b/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h
> index 220d9a7..d0980df 100644
> --- a/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h
> +++ b/include/
On Sun, Feb 03, 2008 at 01:39:02PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100
> > > > B
On Sun, 3 Feb 2008, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100
> > > Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Fix ext4 bitops.
> > >
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 10:04:04PM +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100
> > Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Fix ext4 bitops.
> >
> > This is incomplete. Please tell us what was "fixed
On Fri, 2008-02-01 at 21:02 +0100, Bastian Blank wrote:
> Fix ext4 bitops.
Please provide a better description, as it's not obvious at first sight.
> Signed-off-by: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h b/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h
> index 220d9a7..d0
On Fri, Feb 01, 2008 at 12:22:57PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100
> Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Fix ext4 bitops.
>
> This is incomplete. Please tell us what was "fixed".
>
> If it was a build error then please quote the compile error output in
Fix ext4 bitops.
Signed-off-by: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h b/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h
index 220d9a7..d0980df 100644
--- a/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h
+++ b/include/asm-powerpc/bitops.h
@@ -363,6 +363,8 @@ unsigned long generic_find_next_le_bit
Fix ext4 bitops.
Signed-off-by: Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff --git a/include/asm-s390/bitops.h b/include/asm-s390/bitops.h
index dba6fec..47844fc 100644
--- a/include/asm-s390/bitops.h
+++ b/include/asm-s390/bitops.h
@@ -762,6 +762,8 @@ static inline int sched_find_first_bit(unsigned lo
On Fri, 1 Feb 2008 21:02:08 +0100
Bastian Blank <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Fix ext4 bitops.
>
This is incomplete. Please tell us what was "fixed".
If it was a build error then please quote the compile error output in the
changelog, as well as the usual description of what the problem is, and
12 matches
Mail list logo
