On Thu, 2007-08-30 at 18:38 +0200, Frederik Deweerdt wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:09:59AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> > If the stack pointer is 0xc057a000, then the first stack page is at
> > 0xc0579000 (the stack pointer is decremented before use). Not
> > calculating this correctly cau
On Tue, Aug 28, 2007 at 02:09:59AM +1000, Rusty Russell wrote:
> If the stack pointer is 0xc057a000, then the first stack page is at
> 0xc0579000 (the stack pointer is decremented before use). Not
> calculating this correctly caused guests with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y
> to be killed with a "bad s
If the stack pointer is 0xc057a000, then the first stack page is at
0xc0579000 (the stack pointer is decremented before use). Not
calculating this correctly caused guests with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y
to be killed with a "bad stack page" message: the initial kernel stack
was just proceeding the .s
If the stack pointer is 0xc057a000, then the first stack page is at
0xc0579000 (the stack pointer is decremented before use). Not
calculating this correctly caused guests with CONFIG_DEBUG_PAGEALLOC=y
to be killed with a "bad stack page" message: the initial kernel stack
was just preceeding the .s
4 matches
Mail list logo