On Mon, Feb 28 2005, Dave Olien wrote:
>
> Just trivial, I think you're missing the final "0" argument
> in the __bio_for_each_segment().
Yep indeed, was just a hasty edit...
>
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:51:28PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > This should fix it.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jens Axb
Just trivial, I think you're missing the final "0" argument
in the __bio_for_each_segment().
On Mon, Feb 28, 2005 at 04:51:28PM +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> This should fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> = mm/highmem.c 1.55 vs edited =
> --- 1.55/mm/highmem.c
On Mon, Feb 28 2005, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:51 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28 2005, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 13:39 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 25 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, 25 F
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 08:13 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:51 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 28 2005, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 13:39 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Feb 25 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 16:51 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 28 2005, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> > On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 13:39 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > > On Fri, Feb 25 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > It see
On Mon, Feb 28 2005, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 13:39 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It seems very weird for dm to be shoving NULL page*'s into the middle
> >
On Mon, 2005-02-28 at 07:32 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 13:39 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 25 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > >
> > > > It seems very weird for dm to be shoving NULL page*'s into th
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 13:39 +0100, Jens Axboe wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >
> > > It seems very weird for dm to be shoving NULL page*'s into the middle of a
> > > bio's bvec array, so your fix might end up being a
On Fri, Feb 25 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>
>
> On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > It seems very weird for dm to be shoving NULL page*'s into the middle of a
> > bio's bvec array, so your fix might end up being a workaround pending a
> > closer look at what's going on in there.
>
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> It seems very weird for dm to be shoving NULL page*'s into the middle of a
> bio's bvec array, so your fix might end up being a workaround pending a
> closer look at what's going on in there.
Yes. I don't see how this patch can be anything but banda
Mark Haverkamp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Last September a fix was checked in for a memory leak problem in
> bounce_end_io causing the entire bio to be checked. This ended up
> causing some dm cloned bios that had bounce buffers to free NULL pages
> because their bi_idx can be non-zero. T
On Fri, 2005-02-25 at 09:03 -0800, Mark Haverkamp wrote:
> Last September a fix was checked in for a memory leak problem in
> bounce_end_io causing the entire bio to be checked. This ended up
> causing some dm cloned bios that had bounce buffers to free NULL pages
> because their bi_idx can be non
Last September a fix was checked in for a memory leak problem in
bounce_end_io causing the entire bio to be checked. This ended up
causing some dm cloned bios that had bounce buffers to free NULL pages
because their bi_idx can be non-zero. This patch skips NULL pages in
the bio's bio_vec. I'm
13 matches
Mail list logo
