On Mon, Jun 04, 2007 at 02:13:11PM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > > Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)
> > >
> > > 1 is a power of two, therefore roundup_pow_of_two(1) should return 1. It
> > > does in case the argume
On Mon, 4 Jun 2007, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > 1 is a power of two, therefore roundup_pow_of_two(1) should return 1. It
> > does
> > in case the argument is a variable but in case it's a constant it behaves
> > wrong and returns 0. Probably nobody ever did it so this was never noticed.
> I'm not gett
Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> > Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)
> >
> > 1 is a power of two, therefore roundup_pow_of_two(1) should return 1. It
> > does in case the argument is a variable but in case it's a constant it
> > behaves wrong and return
On Thu, May 17, 2007 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Rolf Eike Beer wrote:
> Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)
>
> 1 is a power of two, therefore roundup_pow_of_two(1) should return 1. It does
> in case the argument is a variable but in case it's a constant it behaves
> wrong and returns 0. Probably nobody ever did
Fix roundup_pow_of_two(1)
1 is a power of two, therefore roundup_pow_of_two(1) should return 1. It does
in case the argument is a variable but in case it's a constant it behaves
wrong and returns 0. Probably nobody ever did it so this was never noticed.
Signed-off-by: Rolf Eike Beer <[EMAIL PROTE
5 matches
Mail list logo