On Mon, 30 Oct 2017 07:46:18 -0500
Brent Taylor wrote:
> Hi Bors, thanks for your quick reply.
>
> On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Boris Brezillon
> wrote:
> > Hi Brent,
> >
> > Subject should be prefixed by "mtd: nand: ", so
> >
> > "mtd: nand: Fix writing mtdoops to nand flash"
>
> Oops,
Hi Bors, thanks for your quick reply.
On Mon, Oct 30, 2017 at 3:23 AM, Boris Brezillon
wrote:
> Hi Brent,
>
> Subject should be prefixed by "mtd: nand: ", so
>
> "mtd: nand: Fix writing mtdoops to nand flash"
Oops, yes, will fix.
>
> On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 23:23:43 -0500
> moto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Brent,
Subject should be prefixed by "mtd: nand: ", so
"mtd: nand: Fix writing mtdoops to nand flash"
On Sun, 29 Oct 2017 23:23:43 -0500
moto...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: Brent Taylor
>
> When mtdoops calls mtd_panic_write, it eventually calls
> panic_nand_write in nand_base.c. In order to
From: Brent Taylor
When mtdoops calls mtd_panic_write, it eventually calls
panic_nand_write in nand_base.c. In order to properly
wait for the nand chip to be ready in panic_nand_wait,
the chip must first be selected.
When using the atmel nand flash controller, a panic
would occur due to a NULL
4 matches
Mail list logo