Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: Do not set the ACPI companion field in the HID device

2015-06-03 Thread Jiri Kosina
On Tue, 2 Jun 2015, Andrew Duggan wrote: > The HID device does not need to know about the ACPI device associated with > the underlying i2c device. Setting the ACPI companion field in the HID device > also has the side effect of causing HID to be set as wake capable, since > acpi_bind_one uses's th

Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: Do not set the ACPI companion field in the HID device

2015-06-02 Thread Mika Westerberg
On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 02:46:20PM -0700, Andrew Duggan wrote: > The HID device does not need to know about the ACPI device associated with > the underlying i2c device. Setting the ACPI companion field in the HID device > also has the side effect of causing HID to be set as wake capable, since > ac

Re: [PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: Do not set the ACPI companion field in the HID device

2015-06-02 Thread Benson Leung
On Tue, Jun 2, 2015 at 2:46 PM, Andrew Duggan wrote: > The HID device does not need to know about the ACPI device associated with > the underlying i2c device. Setting the ACPI companion field in the HID device > also has the side effect of causing HID to be set as wake capable, since > acpi_bind_o

[PATCH] HID: i2c-hid: Do not set the ACPI companion field in the HID device

2015-06-02 Thread Andrew Duggan
The HID device does not need to know about the ACPI device associated with the underlying i2c device. Setting the ACPI companion field in the HID device also has the side effect of causing HID to be set as wake capable, since acpi_bind_one uses's the companion ACPI device's wakeup flags to set the