Re: [PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-22 Thread Daniel Yeisley
On Wed, 2007-03-21 at 16:57 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:37:52AM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:25:38PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:00 -0700, Greg KH wrote: >

Re: [PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-21 Thread Greg KH
On Wed, Mar 21, 2007 at 09:37:52AM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:25:38PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > > > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:00 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:18:24PM -0400, Daniel Ye

Re: [PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-21 Thread Robert Hancock
Daniel Yeisley wrote: Ah. Others are working on providing a fix for this too, but it is being done in the drivers themselves, not in the pci core. Look in the linux-pci mailing list archives for those patches (I don't think they every went into mainline for some reason, but I might be wrong...)

Re: [PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-21 Thread Daniel Yeisley
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 13:26 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:25:38PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:00 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:18:24PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > > > > It has been mentioned before that large systems wit

Re: [PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-20 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 01:25:38PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:00 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:18:24PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > > > It has been mentioned before that large systems with a lot of PCI buses > > > have issues with the 64k I/O sp

Re: [PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-20 Thread Eric W. Biederman
Greg KH <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:18:24PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: >> It has been mentioned before that large systems with a lot of PCI buses >> have issues with the 64k I/O space limit. The ES7000 has a BIOS option >> to either assign I/O space to all adapters,

[PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-20 Thread Daniel Yeisley
It has been mentioned before that large systems with a lot of PCI buses have issues with the 64k I/O space limit. The ES7000 has a BIOS option to either assign I/O space to all adapters, or only to those that need it. A list of supported adapters that don't need it is kept in the BIOS. When this

Re: [PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-20 Thread Daniel Yeisley
On Tue, 2007-03-20 at 11:00 -0700, Greg KH wrote: > On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:18:24PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > > It has been mentioned before that large systems with a lot of PCI buses > > have issues with the 64k I/O space limit. The ES7000 has a BIOS option > > to either assign I/O space

Re: [PATCH] I/O space boot parameter

2007-03-20 Thread Greg KH
On Tue, Mar 20, 2007 at 12:18:24PM -0400, Daniel Yeisley wrote: > It has been mentioned before that large systems with a lot of PCI buses > have issues with the 64k I/O space limit. The ES7000 has a BIOS option > to either assign I/O space to all adapters, or only to those that need > it. A list