On 8/26/2016 1:16 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The 2nd parameter of 'find_first_bit' is the number of bits to search.
> In this case, we are passing 'sizeof(tmp)' which is likely to be 4 or 8
> because 'tmp' is an 'unsigned long'.
>
> It is likely that the number of bits of 'tmp' was expected h
Acked-by: Majd Dibbiny
> On Aug 26, 2016, at 8:25 AM, Christophe JAILLET
> wrote:
>
> The 2nd parameter of 'find_first_bit' is the number of bits to search.
> In this case, we are passing 'sizeof(tmp)' which is likely to be 4 or 8
> because 'tmp' is an 'unsigned long'.
>
> It is likely that t
On Fri, Aug 26, 2016 at 07:16:17AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> The 2nd parameter of 'find_first_bit' is the number of bits to search.
> In this case, we are passing 'sizeof(tmp)' which is likely to be 4 or 8
> because 'tmp' is an 'unsigned long'.
>
> It is likely that the number of bits of '
The 2nd parameter of 'find_first_bit' is the number of bits to search.
In this case, we are passing 'sizeof(tmp)' which is likely to be 4 or 8
because 'tmp' is an 'unsigned long'.
It is likely that the number of bits of 'tmp' was expected here. So use
BITS_PER_LONG instead.
It has been spotted by
4 matches
Mail list logo