On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:35:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
> >On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
> >>From: Rob Pearce
> >>
> >>The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
> >>having LVDS but the
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of such systems. Patch is
On 27/10/13 17:33, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
>> From: Rob Pearce
>>
>> The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
>> having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
>> the list of such systems.
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
> > From: Rob Pearce
> >
> > The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
> > having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
>
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
> From: Rob Pearce
>
> The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
> having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
> the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
>
>
From: Rob Pearce
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce
---
Patch revised to match the D425KT exactly as the
Hi Daniel,
On 27/10/13 13:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> +.matches = {
>> > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, "Intel"),
>> > + DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, "D425KT"),
> At least this one here has a KTW variant with lvds connector. I think we
> need a
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 01:35:30PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
> From: Rob Pearce
>
> These Intel D410PT and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
> having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
> the list of such systems. Tested against 3.9.10 and 3.11.4
>
>
From: Rob Pearce
These Intel D410PT and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of such systems. Tested against 3.9.10 and 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce
---
diff -uprN -X
From: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
These Intel D410PT and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of such systems. Tested against 3.9.10 and 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
---
diff
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 01:35:30PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
These Intel D410PT and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of such systems. Tested against 3.9.10 and
Hi Daniel,
On 27/10/13 13:51, Daniel Vetter wrote:
+.matches = {
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_VENDOR, Intel),
+ DMI_MATCH(DMI_BOARD_NAME, D425KT),
At least this one here has a KTW variant with lvds connector. I think we
need a DMI_EXACT_MATCH. I
From: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
Signed-off-by: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
---
Patch
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of such systems. Patch is against 3.11.4
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 10:33:02AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch
On 27/10/13 17:33, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of such
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but the hardware is not populated. This patch adds them to
the list of
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 11:35:58AM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/27/2013 10:33 AM, Greg KH wrote:
On Sun, Oct 27, 2013 at 04:13:42PM +, Rob Pearce wrote:
From: Rob Pearce r...@flitspace.org.uk
The Intel D410PT(LW) and D425KT Mini-ITX desktop boards both show up as
having LVDS but
18 matches
Mail list logo
