On Saturday, January 31, 2015 02:37:47 PM NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:51:17 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki"
> wrote:
>
> > On Saturday, January 31, 2015 12:06:37 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > On Saturday, January 31, 2015 09:25:45 AM NeilBrown wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Nested IRQs can o
On Sat, 31 Jan 2015 00:51:17 +0100 "Rafael J. Wysocki"
wrote:
> On Saturday, January 31, 2015 12:06:37 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 31, 2015 09:25:45 AM NeilBrown wrote:
> > >
> > > Nested IRQs can only fire when the parent irq fires.
> > > So when the parent is suspended
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 12:06:37 AM Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Saturday, January 31, 2015 09:25:45 AM NeilBrown wrote:
> >
> > Nested IRQs can only fire when the parent irq fires.
> > So when the parent is suspended, there is no need to suspend
> > the child irq.
> >
> > Suspending neste
On Saturday, January 31, 2015 09:25:45 AM NeilBrown wrote:
>
> Nested IRQs can only fire when the parent irq fires.
> So when the parent is suspended, there is no need to suspend
> the child irq.
>
> Suspending nested irqs can cause a problem is they are suspended or
> resumed in the wrong order.
Nested IRQs can only fire when the parent irq fires.
So when the parent is suspended, there is no need to suspend
the child irq.
Suspending nested irqs can cause a problem is they are suspended or
resumed in the wrong order.
If an interrupt fires while the parent is active but the child is
suspe
5 matches
Mail list logo