On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 2:13 AM, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> Hello Mr. Henrik,
>
> On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Hi Aniroop,
>>
I am not sure what the urgency is. It is more of a theoretical problem
ans so far the proposed solutions were actually introducing more
>
Hello Mr. Henrik,
On Thu, Apr 7, 2016 at 1:21 AM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Aniroop,
>
>>> I am not sure what the urgency is. It is more of a theoretical problem
>>> ans so far the proposed solutions were actually introducing more
>>> problems than they were solving.
>>>
>>> I am sorry, bit this
Hi Aniroop,
>> I am not sure what the urgency is. It is more of a theoretical problem
>> ans so far the proposed solutions were actually introducing more
>> problems than they were solving.
>>
>> I am sorry, bit this particular topic is not a priority for me.
>>
>
> There is no hurry at all. :-)
On Wed, Apr 6, 2016 at 11:08 PM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:26:39PM +0530, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Aniroop Mathur
>> wrote:
>> > Hello Mr. Torokhov,
>> >
>> > First of all, Thank you for your reply.
>> >
>> > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:21 A
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:26:39PM +0530, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Aniroop Mathur
> wrote:
> > Hello Mr. Torokhov,
> >
> > First of all, Thank you for your reply.
> >
> > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> > wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:26:
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 10:31 PM, Aniroop Mathur
wrote:
> Hello Mr. Torokhov,
>
> First of all, Thank you for your reply.
>
> On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
> wrote:
>> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:26:57AM +0530, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
>>> Hi Henrik,
>>>
>>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7
As mentioned in documentation, SYN_REPORT should be used to separate two packets
and should not be inserted in between a single packet as otherwise with multiple
SYN_REPORT in a single packet, input reader would not be able to know when the
packet ended really.
Documentation snippet:
* SYN_REPORT:
Hello Mr. Torokhov,
First of all, Thank you for your reply.
On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 3:21 AM, Dmitry Torokhov
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:26:57AM +0530, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
>> Hi Henrik,
>>
>> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> > Hi Dmitry,
>> >
>> >>> diff --git
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:26:57AM +0530, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> > Hi Dmitry,
> >
> >>> diff --git a/drivers/input/input.c b/drivers/input/input.c
> >>> index 8806059..262ef77 100644
> >>> --- a/drivers/input/input.c
> >>> +
Hello Mr. Henrik,
So do you have any further comments on this patch please?
It is pending for more than 20 days. It would be really appreciating
if you could help out to conclude it as soon as possible.
Regards,
Aniroop Mathur
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Aniroop Mathur
wrote:
> Hello Mr. T
Hello Mr. Torokhov / Mr. Henry,
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 11:54 PM, Aniroop Mathur
wrote:
> Hello Mr. Torokhov,
>
> Could you kindly help to update about this patch?
>
So is this patch concluded? Are you applying it?
Thanks,
Aniroop Mathur
> Thank you,
> Aniroop Mathur
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2016
Hello Mr. Torokhov,
Could you kindly help to update about this patch?
Thank you,
Aniroop Mathur
On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 12:26 AM, Aniroop Mathur
wrote:
> Hi Henrik,
>
> On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
>> Hi Dmitry,
>>
diff --git a/drivers/input/input.c b/drivers/in
Hi Henrik,
On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 7:15 PM, Henrik Rydberg wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/input/input.c b/drivers/input/input.c
>>> index 8806059..262ef77 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/input/input.c
>>> +++ b/drivers/input/input.c
>>> @@ -401,8 +401,7 @@ static void input_handle_event(
Hi Dmitry,
>> diff --git a/drivers/input/input.c b/drivers/input/input.c
>> index 8806059..262ef77 100644
>> --- a/drivers/input/input.c
>> +++ b/drivers/input/input.c
>> @@ -401,8 +401,7 @@ static void input_handle_event(struct input_dev *dev,
>> if (dev->num_vals >= 2)
>>
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 9:44 AM, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> As mentioned in documentation, SYN_REPORT should be used to separate two
> packets
> and should not be inserted in between a single packet as otherwise with
> multiple
> SYN_REPORT in a single packet, input reader would not be able to know
Hello Mr. Torokhov,
Could you kindly help to update about below patch?
Thanks,
Aniroop Mathur
On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 11:14 PM, Aniroop Mathur wrote:
> As mentioned in documentation, SYN_REPORT should be used to separate two
> packets
> and should not be inserted in between a single packet as
As mentioned in documentation, SYN_REPORT should be used to separate two packets
and should not be inserted in between a single packet as otherwise with multiple
SYN_REPORT in a single packet, input reader would not be able to know when the
packet ended really.
Documentation snippet:
* SYN_REPORT:
17 matches
Mail list logo
