On Tue, Mar 09, 2021 at 10:53:34PM +0800, jingle.wu wrote:
> Hi Dmitry:
>
> Was this the only issue with the updated patch? Did it work for you
> otherwise?
> -> Yes, the updated patch can work successfully after fix this issue.
OK, great, I applied it.
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
:38 AM
To: jingle
Cc: 'linux-kernel'; 'linux-input'; 'phoenix'; 'dave.wang'; 'josh.chen'
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: elan_i2c - Reduce the resume time for new dev
ices
Hi Jingle,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 04:56:14PM +0800, jingle wrote:
> Hi Dmitry:
>
> 1. missing "i<"
Hi 'Dmitry,
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Dmitry-Torokhov/Re-PATCH-Input-elan_i2c-Reduce-the-resume-time-for-new-dev-ices/20210308-111956
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dtor/input.git next
config: x86_64-randconfig-m001-20210308 (attached as .config
Hi Jingle,
On Mon, Mar 08, 2021 at 04:56:14PM +0800, jingle wrote:
> Hi Dmitry:
>
> 1. missing "i<"
> + u32 quirks = 0;
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; ARRAY_SIZE(elan_i2c_quirks); i++) {
>
> -> for (i = 0; i
> 2. elan_resume () funtion are different with at Chromeos driver.
> @@
m linux kernel to chromeos?
THANKS
JINGLE
-Original Message-
From: 'Dmitry Torokhov' [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2021 11:18 AM
To: jingle
Cc: 'linux-kernel'; 'linux-input'; 'phoenix'; 'dave.wang'; 'josh.chen'
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: elan_i2c - Reduce t
Hi Jingle,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:50:35AM +0800, jingle wrote:
> HI Dmitry:
>
> 1. You mean to let all devices ignore skipping reset/sleep part of device
> initialization?
> 2. The test team found that some old firmware will have errors (invalid
> report etc...), so ELAN can only ensure that
-
From: 'Dmitry Torokhov' [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2021 9:31 AM
To: jingle
Cc: 'linux-kernel'; 'linux-input'; 'phoenix'; 'dave.wang'; 'josh.chen'
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: elan_i2c - Reduce the resume time for new dev
ices
Hi Jingle,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021
Hi Jingle,
On Fri, Mar 05, 2021 at 09:24:05AM +0800, jingle wrote:
> HI Dmitry:
>
> In this case (in the newer parts behavior regarding need to reset after
> powering them on), it is consistent with the original driver behavior with
> any new or old device
> (be called
ks" is equal 0 at probe state.)
THANKS
JINGLE
-Original Message-
From: Dmitry Torokhov [mailto:dmitry.torok...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2021 8:55 AM
To: jingle.wu
Cc: linux-kernel; linux-input; phoenix; dave.wang; josh.chen
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: elan_i2c - Reduce the resu
Hi Jingle,
On Tue, Mar 02, 2021 at 09:04:57AM +0800, jingle.wu wrote:
> HI Dmitry:
>
> So data->ops->initialize(client) essentially performs reset of the
> controller (we may want to rename it even) and as far as I understand
> you would want to avoid resetting the controller on newer devices,
>
HI Dmitry:
So data->ops->initialize(client) essentially performs reset of the
controller (we may want to rename it even) and as far as I understand
you would want to avoid resetting the controller on newer devices,
right?
-> YES
My question is how behavior of older devices differ from the new
11 matches
Mail list logo
