On 08/07/20 17:45, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:31:14PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> The order follows the SDM. I'm tempted to remove the CR0 check
>> altogether, since non-protected-mode always runs at CPL0 AFAIK, but let's
>> keep it close to what the manual says.
>
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 05:31:14PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> The order follows the SDM. I'm tempted to remove the CR0 check
> altogether, since non-protected-mode always runs at CPL0 AFAIK, but let's
> keep it close to what the manual says.
Heh, it wouldn't surprise me in the least if there's
On 08/07/20 17:18, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 03:44:09PM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
>> in guest protected mode, if the current privilege level
>> is not 0 and the pce flag in the cr4 register is cleared,
>> we will inject a #gp for rdpmc usage.
>
> Wrapping at ~58 characters i
On Wed, Jul 08, 2020 at 03:44:09PM +0800, Like Xu wrote:
> in guest protected mode, if the current privilege level
> is not 0 and the pce flag in the cr4 register is cleared,
> we will inject a #gp for rdpmc usage.
Wrapping at ~58 characters is a bit aggressive. checkpatch enforces 75
chars, some
In guest protected mode, if the current privilege level
is not 0 and the PCE flag in the CR4 register is cleared,
we will inject a #GP for RDPMC usage.
Signed-off-by: Like Xu
---
arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/pmu.c
i
5 matches
Mail list logo
