> On Jul 5, 2019, at 6:43 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> On 05/07/19 15:37, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Jul 5, 2019, at 5:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>>
>>> kvm-unit-tests were adjusted to match bare metal behavior, but KVM
>>> itself was not doing what bare metal does; fix that.
>>>
>>>
On 05/07/19 15:37, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> On Jul 5, 2019, at 5:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> kvm-unit-tests were adjusted to match bare metal behavior, but KVM
>> itself was not doing what bare metal does; fix that.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
>
> Reported-by ?
I found it myself while
> On Jul 5, 2019, at 5:14 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> kvm-unit-tests were adjusted to match bare metal behavior, but KVM
> itself was not doing what bare metal does; fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
Reported-by ?
On 05/07/19 14:37, Liran Alon wrote:
>> +u64 rmask = 0x43ff01ffe70cULL;
> Why not rename this to “used_bits_mask” and calculate it properly by macros?
> It seems a lot nicer than having a pre-calculated magic.
Yes, I wanted to do the same but I didn't have time right now. I am
planning
> On 5 Jul 2019, at 15:14, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> kvm-unit-tests were adjusted to match bare metal behavior, but KVM
> itself was not doing what bare metal does; fix that.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
> ---
> arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 6 +-
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1
kvm-unit-tests were adjusted to match bare metal behavior, but KVM
itself was not doing what bare metal does; fix that.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c | 6 +-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c b/arch/x86/kvm/lapic.c
6 matches
Mail list logo
