On 20/02/19 08:06, Yu Zhang wrote:
> Hi Paolo, any comments on this patch? And the other one(kvm: x86: Return
> LA57 feature based on hardware capability )? :-)
Queued both, thanks.
Paolo
> On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 12:09:23AM +0800, Yu Zhang wrote:
>> Previously, commit 7dcd57552008 ("x86/kvm/mmu
On Wed, Feb 20, 2019 at 03:06:10PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
> Yu Zhang writes:
>
> > Previously, commit 7dcd57552008 ("x86/kvm/mmu: check if tdp/shadow
> > MMU reconfiguration is needed") offered some optimization to avoid
> > the unnecessary reconfiguration. Yet one scenario is broken - wh
Yu Zhang writes:
> Previously, commit 7dcd57552008 ("x86/kvm/mmu: check if tdp/shadow
> MMU reconfiguration is needed") offered some optimization to avoid
> the unnecessary reconfiguration. Yet one scenario is broken - when
> cpuid changes VM's maximum physical address width, reconfiguration
> is
Hi Paolo, any comments on this patch? And the other one(kvm: x86: Return
LA57 feature based on hardware capability )? :-)
On Fri, Feb 01, 2019 at 12:09:23AM +0800, Yu Zhang wrote:
> Previously, commit 7dcd57552008 ("x86/kvm/mmu: check if tdp/shadow
> MMU reconfiguration is needed") offered some op
Previously, commit 7dcd57552008 ("x86/kvm/mmu: check if tdp/shadow
MMU reconfiguration is needed") offered some optimization to avoid
the unnecessary reconfiguration. Yet one scenario is broken - when
cpuid changes VM's maximum physical address width, reconfiguration
is needed to reset the reserved
5 matches
Mail list logo