Paolo,
On 9/28/20 3:01 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 28/09/20 07:53, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
Hi,
Are there any issues or concerns about this patch?
Yes, sorry I haven't replied yet. Looks like Linus is doing an -rc8 so
there's plenty of time to have it in 5.9.
The thing I'm wondering is
On 28/09/20 07:53, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any issues or concerns about this patch?
Yes, sorry I haven't replied yet. Looks like Linus is doing an -rc8 so
there's plenty of time to have it in 5.9.
The thing I'm wondering is, why is svm_update_pi_irte doing anything if
y
Hi,
Are there any issues or concerns about this patch?
Thank you,
Suravee
On 9/22/20 3:44 PM, Suravee Suthikulpanit wrote:
The struct vcpu_svm.ir_list and ir_list_lock are being accessed even when
AVIC is not enabled, while current code only initialize the list and
the lock only when AVIC is e
The struct vcpu_svm.ir_list and ir_list_lock are being accessed even when
AVIC is not enabled, while current code only initialize the list and
the lock only when AVIC is enabled. This ended up trigger NULL pointer
dereference bug in the function vm_ir_list_del with the following
call trace:
sv
4 matches
Mail list logo