On 09/06/2012 12:54 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 12:11 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
>> On 09/03/2012 02:27 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 14:37 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:10:48PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> >> > For p
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 12:11 +0300, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 09/03/2012 02:27 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 14:37 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:10:48PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> >> > For processors that support VPIDs we should invalidate the
On 09/03/2012 02:27 AM, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 14:37 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:10:48PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
>> > For processors that support VPIDs we should invalidate the page table entry
>> > specified by the lineal address. For t
On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 14:37 -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:10:48PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > For processors that support VPIDs we should invalidate the page table entry
> > specified by the lineal address. For this purpose add support for individual
> > address i
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 06:10:48PM +0200, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> For processors that support VPIDs we should invalidate the page table entry
> specified by the lineal address. For this purpose add support for individual
> address invalidations.
Not necessary - a single context invalidation is pe
For processors that support VPIDs we should invalidate the page table entry
specified by the lineal address. For this purpose add support for individual
address invalidations.
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso
---
arch/x86/include/asm/vmx.h |6 --
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 15 +
6 matches
Mail list logo
