Re: [PATCH] KVM: x86: inline kvm_ioapic_handles_vector()

On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 09:52:41PM +0100, Radim Krčmář wrote: > An overhead from function call is not appropriate for its size and > frequency of execution. > > Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini > Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář > --- > I'm not very fond of that smp_rmb(): there is no real synchronizati

[PATCH] KVM: x86: inline kvm_ioapic_handles_vector()

An overhead from function call is not appropriate for its size and frequency of execution. Suggested-by: Paolo Bonzini Signed-off-by: Radim Krčmář --- I'm not very fond of that smp_rmb(): there is no real synchronization against update_handled_vectors(), so the only point I see is to drop