Paolo Bonzini writes:
> On 17/02/2017 01:45, Bandan Das wrote:
>> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>>
>>> The FPU is always active now when running KVM.
>>
>> The lazy code was a performance optimization, correct ?
>> Is this just dormant code and being removed ? Maybe
>> mentioning the reasoning in a li
On 17/02/2017 01:45, Bandan Das wrote:
> Paolo Bonzini writes:
>
>> The FPU is always active now when running KVM.
>
> The lazy code was a performance optimization, correct ?
> Is this just dormant code and being removed ? Maybe
> mentioning the reasoning in a little more detail is a good
> id
Paolo Bonzini writes:
> The FPU is always active now when running KVM.
The lazy code was a performance optimization, correct ?
Is this just dormant code and being removed ? Maybe
mentioning the reasoning in a little more detail is a good
idea.
The removal itself looks clean. I was really hoping
On Thu, Feb 16, 2017 at 1:33 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> The FPU is always active now when running KVM.
>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
Reviewed-by: David Matlack
Glad to see this cleanup! Thanks for doing it.
> ---
> arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 --
> arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c
The FPU is always active now when running KVM.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
---
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h | 3 --
arch/x86/kvm/cpuid.c| 2 -
arch/x86/kvm/svm.c | 43 ++-
arch/x86/kvm/vmx.c | 112 ++--
5 matches
Mail list logo