On 21 April 2014 22:20, Andi Kleen wrote:
> Hmm that's odd. I guess could assign it to a dummy variable
That produces this:
scripts/mod/modpost.c: In function ‘remove_dot’:
scripts/mod/modpost.c:1708:16: warning: variable ‘ignore’ set but not
used [-Wunused-but-set-variable]
> or use viro's var
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 10:25:18AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > --- a/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > +++ b/scripts/mod/modpost.c
> > @@ -1707,7 +1707,7 @@ static char *remove_dot(char *s)
> > int n = strcspn(s, ".");
> >
> > if (n > 0 && s[n] != 0) {
> > - strtoul(s + n +
On 18 April 2014 10:05, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> Apparently someone's C library declares strtoul with warn_unused_result.
> Cast to void to avoid the warning. Error handling is not useful here.
I just did a x86_64 compilation without a CROSS_COMPILE= option
(My .config also had a
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 05:49:04AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 06:35:56AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > From: Andi Kleen
> >
> > Apparently someone's C library declares strtoul with warn_unused_result.
> > Cast to void to avoid the warning. Error handling is not useful here.
>
On Fri, Apr 18, 2014 at 06:35:56AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> From: Andi Kleen
>
> Apparently someone's C library declares strtoul with warn_unused_result.
> Cast to void to avoid the warning. Error handling is not useful here.
Umm... Since we don't give a fsck for the value, isn't that simply
From: Andi Kleen
Apparently someone's C library declares strtoul with warn_unused_result.
Cast to void to avoid the warning. Error handling is not useful here.
Cc: Viresh Kumar
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen
---
scripts/mod/modpost.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --gi
6 matches
Mail list logo