On Tue, 31 May 2016, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Fix for security_inode_getsecurity and -EOPNOTSUPP
>
> Serge Hallyn pointed out that the current implementation of
> security_inode_getsecurity() works if there is only one hook
> provided for it, but will fail i
On Tue, 31 May 2016, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Fix for security_inode_getsecurity and -EOPNOTSUPP
>
> Serge Hallyn pointed out that the current implementation of
> security_inode_getsecurity() works if there is only one hook
> provided for it, but will fail i
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:24:15PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Fix for security_inode_getsecurity and -EOPNOTSUPP
>
> Serge Hallyn pointed out that the current implementation of
> security_inode_getsecurity() works if there is only one hoo
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 05:24:15PM -0700, Casey Schaufler wrote:
> Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Fix for security_inode_getsecurity and -EOPNOTSUPP
>
> Serge Hallyn pointed out that the current implementation of
> security_inode_getsecurity() works if there is only one hoo
Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Fix for security_inode_getsecurity and -EOPNOTSUPP
Serge Hallyn pointed out that the current implementation of
security_inode_getsecurity() works if there is only one hook
provided for it, but will fail if there is more than one and
the attribute requested isn't supplied
Subject: [PATCH] LSM: Fix for security_inode_getsecurity and -EOPNOTSUPP
Serge Hallyn pointed out that the current implementation of
security_inode_getsecurity() works if there is only one hook
provided for it, but will fail if there is more than one and
the attribute requested isn't supplied
6 matches
Mail list logo
