On Sun, 9 Feb 2014, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> While I agree about the CONFIG_MIPS64 => CONFIG_64BIT replacement, I
> wonder if CONFIG_MIPS32_R2 shouldn't rather be CONFIG_CPU_MIPSR2
> (maybe even the existing CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R2 are wrong here).
Absolutely. You should be able to build a 32-bit ker
I think Paul Bolle's patch is correct and my first patch is not
enough. So it needn't to make a separate patch, just take Paul's patch
and my second patch is enough.
On Mon, Feb 10, 2014 at 3:45 AM, Aaro Koskinen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 05:26:59PM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
>> On
Hi,
On Sun, Feb 09, 2014 at 05:26:59PM +0100, Jonas Gorski wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> > Commit 597ce1723e0f ("MIPS: Support for 64-bit FP with O32 binaries")
> > introduced references to two undefined Kconfig macros. CONFIG_MIPS32_R2
> > should clearly be replace
On Sun, Feb 9, 2014 at 2:32 PM, Paul Bolle wrote:
> Commit 597ce1723e0f ("MIPS: Support for 64-bit FP with O32 binaries")
> introduced references to two undefined Kconfig macros. CONFIG_MIPS32_R2
> should clearly be replaced with CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R2. And CONFIG_MIPS64
> should apparently be repla
Commit 597ce1723e0f ("MIPS: Support for 64-bit FP with O32 binaries")
introduced references to two undefined Kconfig macros. CONFIG_MIPS32_R2
should clearly be replaced with CONFIG_CPU_MIPS32_R2. And CONFIG_MIPS64
should apparently be replaced with CONFIG_64BIT.
Signed-off-by: Paul Bolle
---
Unte
5 matches
Mail list logo