On 05/02/16 at 10:39P, John Stultz wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Minfei Huang wrote:
> > It is unnecessary to continue looping the list, if we find there is an
> > entry that the value of rating is smaller than the new one. It is safe
> > to be out the loop, because all of entry are in
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:20 AM, Minfei Huang wrote:
> It is unnecessary to continue looping the list, if we find there is an
> entry that the value of rating is smaller than the new one. It is safe
> to be out the loop, because all of entry are inserted in descending
> order.
>
> Signed-off-by: M
Ping.
Any comment is appreciate.
Thanks
Minfei
On 04/25/16 at 05:20P, Minfei Huang wrote:
> It is unnecessary to continue looping the list, if we find there is an
> entry that the value of rating is smaller than the new one. It is safe
> to be out the loop, because all of entry are inserted in d
It is unnecessary to continue looping the list, if we find there is an
entry that the value of rating is smaller than the new one. It is safe
to be out the loop, because all of entry are inserted in descending
order.
Signed-off-by: Minfei Huang
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 8 +---
1 file
4 matches
Mail list logo