On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:30:09PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has
> > just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors.
> > What is worse, even if you
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, David Woodhouse wrote:
> On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has
> > just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors.
> > What is worse, even if you touch just one li
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has
> just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors.
> What is worse, even if you touch just one little header in some corner
> (or possibly none) and typ
ff by it and have CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK=n
set in my .config -- but that could lead to breakages. Hence:
[PATCH] Make headers_check less chatty for success cases
We still echo verbosely (and fail, obviously) for any errors encountered.
Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--
4 matches
Mail list logo