Re: [PATCH] Make headers_check less chatty for success cases

2007-07-31 Thread Sam Ravnborg
On Tue, Jul 31, 2007 at 05:30:09PM +0100, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has > > just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors. > > What is worse, even if you

Re: [PATCH] Make headers_check less chatty for success cases

2007-07-31 Thread Satyam Sharma
On Tue, 31 Jul 2007, David Woodhouse wrote: > On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > > "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has > > just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors. > > What is worse, even if you touch just one li

Re: [PATCH] Make headers_check less chatty for success cases

2007-07-31 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2007-07-31 at 22:10 +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote: > "make headers_check" is too verbose. It likes to chat even if it has > just _successfully_ checked a header, and not just on seeing errors. > What is worse, even if you touch just one little header in some corner > (or possibly none) and typ

[PATCH] Make headers_check less chatty for success cases

2007-07-31 Thread Satyam Sharma
ff by it and have CONFIG_HEADERS_CHECK=n set in my .config -- but that could lead to breakages. Hence: [PATCH] Make headers_check less chatty for success cases We still echo verbosely (and fail, obviously) for any errors encountered. Signed-off-by: Satyam Sharma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --