On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:14:19AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:16:50AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > >
> > > The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
> > > preempt_disable()
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:16:50AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
>
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> >
> > The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
> > preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
> > rcutorture's RNG
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:16:50AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
rcutorture's RNG to gather
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 09:14:19AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2007 at 11:16:50AM +0530, Satyam Sharma wrote:
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
preempt_disable() and
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>
> The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
> preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
> rcutorture's RNG to gather entropy from the new cpu_clock() interface
> (relying on interrupts,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:29:04AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > Yes. Using a hash function rather than a trivial LFSR is preferable.
> > > But pulling the guts
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:58:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:58:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at
On Mon, Sep 03, 2007 at 08:29:04AM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Mon, Aug 27, 2007 at 06:15:54PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
Yes. Using a hash function rather than a trivial LFSR is preferable.
But pulling the guts out and
Hi Paul,
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
rcutorture's RNG to gather entropy from the new cpu_clock() interface
(relying on interrupts,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:58:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 02:40:37PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:58:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:58:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
> > > "Paul E. McKenney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
>
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
> > "Paul E. McKenney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
Paul E. McKenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
Paul E. McKenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Repost of
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 11:58:31AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Thu, Aug 23, 2007 at 01:06:58PM -0500, Matt Mackall wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 01:00:22PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
> "Paul E. McKenney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
> >
> > The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
>
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
"Paul E. McKenney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
>
> The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
> preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
Paul E. McKenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
On Fri, Aug 17, 2007 at 11:53:56AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Wed, 15 Aug 2007 19:49:04 -0700
Paul E. McKenney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
rcutorture's RNG to gather entropy from the new cpu_clock() interface
(relying on
Repost of http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/8/10/472 made available by request.
The locking used by get_random_bytes() can conflict with the
preempt_disable() and synchronize_sched() form of RCU. This patch changes
rcutorture's RNG to gather entropy from the new cpu_clock() interface
(relying on
24 matches
Mail list logo