"Randy.Dunlap" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Vivek Goyal wrote:
> > Hi Andrew,
> > This patch has been generated against 2.6.11-rc2-mm2. This fixes a very
> > minor bug in kexec.
>
> Have you run sparse on a kexec-patched kernel tree?
> I have, but not lately. It needed some s/0/NULL/ in
Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi Andrew,
This patch has been generated against 2.6.11-rc2-mm2. This fixes a very
minor bug in kexec.
Have you run sparse on a kexec-patched kernel tree?
I have, but not lately. It needed some s/0/NULL/ in several places,
but that was before the latest big changes...
diff -puN
Hi Andrew,
This patch has been generated against 2.6.11-rc2-mm2. This fixes a very
minor bug in kexec.
Thanks
Vivek
This patch fixes a minor bug in kexec. Changing the data type of flags makes
sure proper control flow of code during crash event.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi Andrew,
This patch has been generated against 2.6.11-rc2-mm2. This fixes a very
minor bug in kexec.
Thanks
Vivek
This patch fixes a minor bug in kexec. Changing the data type of flags makes
sure proper control flow of code during crash event.
Signed-off-by: Vivek Goyal [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi Andrew,
This patch has been generated against 2.6.11-rc2-mm2. This fixes a very
minor bug in kexec.
Have you run sparse on a kexec-patched kernel tree?
I have, but not lately. It needed some s/0/NULL/ in several places,
but that was before the latest big changes...
diff -puN
Randy.Dunlap [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Vivek Goyal wrote:
Hi Andrew,
This patch has been generated against 2.6.11-rc2-mm2. This fixes a very
minor bug in kexec.
Have you run sparse on a kexec-patched kernel tree?
I have, but not lately. It needed some s/0/NULL/ in several places,
but
6 matches
Mail list logo
