At 03:58 20/07/2001, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>This is clearly not my day for sending emails...
>
>Sorry. The attachment was fine on last email but a little misunderstanding
>between elm and myself resulted in the invention of two non-existent email
>addresses and put them in the To: field.
This is clearly not my day for sending emails...
Sorry. The attachment was fine on last email but a little misunderstanding
between elm and myself resulted in the invention of two non-existent email
addresses and put them in the To: field. )-: Just remove them before
replying... They are
Sorry for confusion. Here goes again, sent with elm, and tested for being
clear text inline and that white space is not mangled.
-
Linus,
Please consider attached patch. It does three things:
- Adds docbook style comments to a very few functions relating to the page
cache
At 3:03 AM +0100 2001-07-20, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
>I do appologize. I didn't realize pine would do this. In pine I can just
>read the attachment as text and in Eudora it just appears as inlined
>text without any indication of it being a separate attachment, so I just
>assumed that it was
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:03:58 +0100 (BST), Anton Altaparmakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> I will repost as soon as I manage to convince pine of it's wrong ways...
You can't, so don't bother. Just inline it, ctrl-r should do the trick. However
be careful, newer pine's like to strip trailing
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
> > while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
>
> Quite so. Linus told you many times not to send patches
> in MIME and I happen to agree.
>
> This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
> while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Quite so. Linus told you many times not to send patches
in MIME and I happen to agree.
> Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII;
Linus,
Please consider attached patch. It does three things:
- Adds docbook style comments to a very few functions relating to the page
cache (mm/filemap.c) and does very minor clean up on those to keep within
80 character wide lines (only look affected).
- Minor cleanup making the
Linus,
Please consider attached patch. It does three things:
- Adds docbook style comments to a very few functions relating to the page
cache (mm/filemap.c) and does very minor clean up on those to keep within
80 character wide lines (only look affected).
- Minor cleanup making the
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Quite so. Linus told you many times not to send patches
in MIME and I happen to agree.
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII;
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text,
while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools.
Quite so. Linus told you many times not to send patches
in MIME and I happen to agree.
On Fri, 20 Jul 2001 03:03:58 +0100 (BST), Anton Altaparmakov [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I will repost as soon as I manage to convince pine of it's wrong ways...
You can't, so don't bother. Just inline it, ctrl-r should do the trick. However
be careful, newer pine's like to strip trailing spaces
At 3:03 AM +0100 2001-07-20, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
I do appologize. I didn't realize pine would do this. In pine I can just
read the attachment as text and in Eudora it just appears as inlined
text without any indication of it being a separate attachment, so I just
assumed that it was sent
Sorry for confusion. Here goes again, sent with elm, and tested for being
clear text inline and that white space is not mangled.
-
Linus,
Please consider attached patch. It does three things:
- Adds docbook style comments to a very few functions relating to the page
cache
This is clearly not my day for sending emails...
Sorry. The attachment was fine on last email but a little misunderstanding
between elm and myself resulted in the invention of two non-existent email
addresses and put them in the To: field. )-: Just remove them before
replying... They are
At 03:58 20/07/2001, Anton Altaparmakov wrote:
This is clearly not my day for sending emails...
Sorry. The attachment was fine on last email but a little misunderstanding
between elm and myself resulted in the invention of two non-existent email
addresses and put them in the To: field. )-:
16 matches
Mail list logo
