On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 at 20:23 +, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
> > there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
> > Mobile Pentium 4 HT.
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:23:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
>> there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
>> Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 20:23:00 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this patch, the
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005 at 20:23 +, Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
> > there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
> > Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
> > there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
> > Mobile Pentium 4 HT.
Steven Rostedt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
> there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
> Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this patch, the NMI won't be setup. Is
> there a reason that if
Hi,
I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this patch, the NMI won't be setup. Is
there a reason that if the x86_model is greater than 0x3 it will return.
Since
Hi,
I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this patch, the NMI won't be setup. Is
there a reason that if the x86_model is greater than 0x3 it will return.
Since
Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this patch, the NMI won't be setup. Is
there a reason that if the
On Thu, 2005-08-18 at 20:23 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this patch,
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Rostedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
I'm resending this since I don't see it in git yet, and I'm wondering if
there is a problem with this patch. I have a IBM ThinkPad G41 with a
Mobile Pentium 4 HT. Without this patch, the NMI
I'm trying to get the nmi working with my laptop (IBM ThinkPad G41) and
after debugging it a while, I found that the nmi code doesn't want to
set it up for this particular CPU.
Here I have:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model
I'm trying to get the nmi working with my laptop (IBM ThinkPad G41) and
after debugging it a while, I found that the nmi code doesn't want to
set it up for this particular CPU.
Here I have:
$ cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 15
model
14 matches
Mail list logo
