On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 11:11:07AM -0700, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
> It is only the nested removal problem.
Well such a count could apply to direct removals too. In other
words, you could ask modprobe to remove all modules for which
this count is zero.
Cheers,
--
Visit Openswan at http://www.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 13:37:39 +0800
Herbert Xu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > So we have an unsolvable problem here then, unless infrastructure gets added
> > that allows a module to declare itself as not-implicit-unload-safe, forcing
> > modprobe -r to
Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So we have an unsolvable problem here then, unless infrastructure gets added
> that allows a module to declare itself as not-implicit-unload-safe, forcing
> modprobe -r to keep its hands off it. Ugly.
Yes I've always wanted to have a separate count that i
>> >Sounds like a module utilities problem since unloading one module doesn't
>> >normally unload others.
>>
>> I have to disagree here - 'modprobe -r' is specifically unloading all
>> modules the
>> specified one references as long as they have a use count of zero. The
>> difference to other net
On Sep 27 2007 07:51, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>
>You need every socket to close and all routes to go away including the
>routes through loopback device, and still there probably are control
>sockets buried inside ipv6 that hold ref count.
>
>IMHO the kernel should just admit that IPV6 can't be
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:54:23 +0200
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:18:55 +0200 (CEST)
> > Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >> On Sep 26 2007 14:06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >>
> > No, network devices do
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:40:10 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 26.09.07 19:12 >>>
> >On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:08:19 +0100
> >"Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> >>> Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 26.09.07 17:37 >>>
> >> >O
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:18:55 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 26 2007 14:06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
No, network devices don't do reference counting.
Could you explain why, please?
After `udevd` on boot loads lots of u
>>> Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 26.09.07 19:12 >>>
>On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:08:19 +0100
>"Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> >>> Stephen Hemminger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 26.09.07 17:37 >>>
>> >On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:53:27 +0100
>> >"Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >>
On Thu, 27 Sep 2007 00:18:55 +0200 (CEST)
Jan Engelhardt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Sep 26 2007 14:06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> >> >
> >> > No, network devices don't do reference counting.
> >>
> >> Could you explain why, please?
> >>
> >> After `udevd` on boot loads lots of unused cra
On Sep 26 2007 14:06, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> >
>> > No, network devices don't do reference counting.
>>
>> Could you explain why, please?
>>
>> After `udevd` on boot loads lots of unused crap, i surrendered, and use
>> $(rmmod `lsmod | just first column`). Networing bravely wipes away. OK,
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 23:06:53 +0200
Oleg Verych <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:37:05 -0700
> * Organization: Linux Foundation
> >
> > On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:53:27 +0100
> > "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Otherwise 'modprobe -r' on a module having a dependency
* Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:37:05 -0700
* Organization: Linux Foundation
>
> On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:53:27 +0100
> "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Otherwise 'modprobe -r' on a module having a dependency on bridge will
>> implicitly unload bridge, bringing down all connectivity that was
>> us
On Wed, 26 Sep 2007 08:53:27 +0100
"Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Otherwise 'modprobe -r' on a module having a dependency on bridge will
> implicitly unload bridge, bringing down all connectivity that was
> using bridges.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
No, netwo
Otherwise 'modprobe -r' on a module having a dependency on bridge will
implicitly unload bridge, bringing down all connectivity that was using
bridges.
Signed-off-by: Jan Beulich <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
net/bridge/br_if.c |9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
--- linux-2.6.23-rc8/net/br
15 matches
Mail list logo