It's not a huge deal obviously but your commit was a6bed7a54165 ("NTB:
Introduce NTB MSI Test Client") but you know that if I had sent a patch
called ("NTB: remove a duplicate check") people would have correctly
complained because the patch prefix is too vague.
What I'm saying is we do this all th
,,
On 2019-06-18 11:32 p.m., Dan Carpenter wrote:
> We already verified that the "nm->isr_ctx" allocation succeeded so there
> is no need to check again here.
>
> Fixes: a6bed7a54165 ("NTB: Introduce NTB MSI Test Client")
> Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
Hmm, yup, not sure how that slipped throug
We already verified that the "nm->isr_ctx" allocation succeeded so there
is no need to check again here.
Fixes: a6bed7a54165 ("NTB: Introduce NTB MSI Test Client")
Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter
---
Hey Logan, can pick a patch prefix when you're introducing a new module?
"[PATCH] NTB/test: Introduc
3 matches
Mail list logo