On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 13:06 +0200, Roman Zippel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>
> > The clock_was_set() call in seconds_overflow() which happens only when
> > leap seconds are inserted / deleted is wrong in two aspects:
> >
> > 1. it results in a call to on_each
Hi,
On Tuesday 03 July 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The clock_was_set() call in seconds_overflow() which happens only when
> leap seconds are inserted / deleted is wrong in two aspects:
>
> 1. it results in a call to on_each_cpu() with interrupts disabled
> 2. it is potential deadlock source vs
On Tue, 2007-07-03 at 20:05 +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> The clock_was_set() call in seconds_overflow() which happens only when
> leap seconds are inserted / deleted is wrong in two aspects:
>
> 1. it results in a call to on_each_cpu() with interrupts disabled
> 2. it is potential deadlock sour
* Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The clock_was_set() call in seconds_overflow() which happens only when
> leap seconds are inserted / deleted is wrong in two aspects:
>
> 1. it results in a call to on_each_cpu() with interrupts disabled
> 2. it is potential deadlock source vs. cal
The clock_was_set() call in seconds_overflow() which happens only when
leap seconds are inserted / deleted is wrong in two aspects:
1. it results in a call to on_each_cpu() with interrupts disabled
2. it is potential deadlock source vs. call_lock in smp_call_function()
The only possible side effe
5 matches
Mail list logo