On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 05:37:51PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:28:37AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > If we see a type of PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT or
> > > PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCIE_BRIDGE, I think we have to assume that's accurate
> > > (which we already do today -- for t
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 10:28:37AM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > If we see a type of PCI_EXP_TYPE_ROOT_PORT or
> > PCI_EXP_TYPE_PCIE_BRIDGE, I think we have to assume that's accurate
> > (which we already do today -- for those types, we assume the device
> > has a secondary link).
> >
> > For
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 09:17:17AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:58:20PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 06:52:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > > Right, it looks like we need some sort of flag there anyway.
> > >
> > > Does this mean you'r
On Tue, Aug 20, 2019 at 12:58:20PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 06:52:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > > Right, it looks like we need some sort of flag there anyway.
> >
> > Does this mean you're looking at getting rid of "has_secondary_link",
> > you think it's impo
On Mon, Aug 19, 2019 at 06:52:45PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > Right, it looks like we need some sort of flag there anyway.
>
> Does this mean you're looking at getting rid of "has_secondary_link",
> you think it's impossible, or you think it's not worth trying?
I was of thinking that we need
On Tue, Aug 06, 2019 at 01:12:30PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 04:53:39PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > [+cc FPGA folks, just FYI; I'm pretty sure PCI could do a much better
> > job supporting FPGAs, so any input is welcome!]
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 06:03:41PM
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 04:53:39PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc FPGA folks, just FYI; I'm pretty sure PCI could do a much better
> job supporting FPGAs, so any input is welcome!]
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:39:53AM -0500
On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 04:53:39PM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> [+cc FPGA folks, just FYI; I'm pretty sure PCI could do a much better
> job supporting FPGAs, so any input is welcome!]
>
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:39:53AM -0500
[+cc FPGA folks, just FYI; I'm pretty sure PCI could do a much better
job supporting FPGAs, so any input is welcome!]
On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 06:03:41PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2019 at 08:39:53AM -0500, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 01:49:42PM +0300, Mika
9 matches
Mail list logo