Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2021-03-30 Thread Tyler Hicks
On 2020-09-10 13:46:27, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:21:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > [+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] > > > > > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote: > > > > Do not

Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2020-09-10 Thread Rob Herring
On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > [+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote: > > Do not use printk in raw_spinlocks, > > it will cause BUG: Invalid wait context. > > > > The trace reported by lockdep follows. > > > > [

Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2020-09-10 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 9/10/2020 12:20 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: On 9/10/2020 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:21:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: [+cc Mark, Florian,

Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2020-09-10 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:50:07AM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > On 9/10/2020 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:21:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > > > > > [+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2020-09-10 Thread Florian Fainelli
On 9/10/2020 11:46 AM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:21:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: [+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote: Do not use printk in raw_spinlocks,

Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2020-09-10 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 08:21:06AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: > > > > [+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] > > > > On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote: > > > Do not use printk in raw_spinlocks, > > > it will cause BUG:

Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2020-09-10 Thread Scott Branden
On 2020-09-10 7:21 a.m., Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Sep 9, 2020 at 8:07 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote: >> [+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] >> >> On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote: >>> Do not use printk in raw_spinlocks, >>> it will cause BUG: Invalid wait context. >>> >>>

Re: [PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2020-09-09 Thread Bjorn Helgaas
[+cc Mark, Florian, Rob, Scott] On Sat, Aug 01, 2020 at 09:25:49AM +0800, Xingxing Su wrote: > Do not use printk in raw_spinlocks, > it will cause BUG: Invalid wait context. > > The trace reported by lockdep follows. > > [2.986113] = > [2.986115] [ BUG:

[PATCH] PCI: Don't use Printk in raw_spinlocks

2020-07-31 Thread Xingxing Su
Do not use printk in raw_spinlocks, it will cause BUG: Invalid wait context. The trace reported by lockdep follows. [2.986113] = [2.986115] [ BUG: Invalid wait context ] [2.986116] 5.8.0-rc1+ #11 Not tainted [2.986118] - [